For successful completion of the course MRes students must submit the following written work for examination:
- Two essays, each of not more than 4,000 words in length, on subjects of social anthropological research chosen by the candidate from a list which will be announced by the Degree Committee for the Faculty of Human, Social and Political Science by the Division of Michaelmas Term.
The list covers topics from the pre-fieldwork seminar series and students must answer one question on anthropology and social theory and one on professional research practice.
Please see the List of MRes Essay titles.
Each essay will count for 10% of the total marks for the examination.
- One essay of not more than 4,000 words relating to research methods. This is the individual report on the extended case study prepared for the Ethnographic Methods course.
This essay will count for 10% of the total marks for the examination.
- Assessments for the SSRMC modules - Reading and Understanding Statistics and Survey Design are two mandatory SSRMC modules for MRes students. Assessments will be administered by the SSRMC as part of the relevant modules on a pass/fail basis.
These assessments will count for 10% of the total marks for the examination.
- A thesis of not more than 15,000 words in length, including footnotes, but excluding tables, appendices, and bibliography, on a subject approved by the Degree Committee for the Faculty of Human, Social and Political Science. The examination may include an oral examination on the thesis and on the general field of knowledge within which it falls.
The primary aim of the thesis should be the theoretical analysis of ethnographic material; it may also be a new synthesis of data, and/ or new interpretation of existing material.
The mark awarded for the thesis will comprise 60% of the total.
- Research Proposal Portfolio
The research proposal proposal (7 000 words) is submitted separately. It distils your research training to date and is at the core of your own plans. All students submitting a research proposal and hoping to proceed to doctoral research will be given a fieldwork clearance interview by the PhD Committee as part of the oral examination. Whichever way you organise your research proposal and thesis, you must have covered all items specified as elements of the research proposal portfolio.
The formal regulations for the MRes in Social Anthropology can be found in the University’s Statutes and Ordinances.
On this page:
In terms of formal approval procedures, the PhD Committee, consisting of four UTOs in the Division, acts as Ethics Committee for doctoral and MRes students. Ethical clearance is an intrinsic part of the Fieldwork Clearance procedure all PhD students must clear before they begin fieldwork. This body and the Divisional Committee have final responsibility for ethics clearance at the division level.
The University of Cambridge Research Integrity website provides extensive ethics and integrity guidelines to support staff and students. The Association of Social Anthropologists also provides . Please consult these carefully in advance of applying for research clearance from the division. Also see ESRC framework for research ethics and AAA ethical guidelines. As the statement from the ASA chair usefully points out, the guidelines are not intended to provide ready-made answers or to absolve researchers from ethical responsibilities, but should be a starting point for a concrete reflection on the specific ethical issues which may have to be borne in mind in the case of your specific research:
“Codes of practice and guidelines are of necessity succinct documents, couched in abstract and general terms. They serve as a baseline for starting to think about ethical issues, but cannot of their nature encompass the complexities of concrete situations and the dilemmas of choice and positioning that anthropologists routinely face as they navigate through a variety of intersecting fields of power and responsibility and start to consider how their own work both reflects and affects power relations. If ethics is seen simply as a question of avoiding a lawsuit and our codes are simply a list of restrictions on conduct designed to protect us from interference, our ethical purpose will simply be a matter of self-serving professional interest.” (Statement from the Chair, ASA)
Researchers should also be aware of data protection issues that arise as a result of conducting research. In particular, you should keep in mind that when using cloud-based storage, or programmes such as Evernote, data will be crossing international borders even if your research does not. This means you should be aware of any issues raised concerning not only the security of your own research data, but also the legal issues surrounding data protection of all personal data. Further information on data protection can be found at the following places:
The University of Cambridge Staff and Student Information
Research data Q&A from Jisc Legal
SOAS information on personal data in research which covers some issues of particular interest to anthropologists in more depth
If, having read these guidelines, you have any questions or would like any advice relating to research ethics, please consult the division’s research ethics officer, mc288[at]cam.ac.uk.,
Submission deadlines are announced annually in the MRes Diary.
Social Theory and Professional Research Practice essays: Friday 20 January 2017, or Friday 28 April 2017
Ethnographic case study: Friday 28 April 2017
Thesis: Friday 25 August 2017
All items submitted for assessment for this course must include a signed statement of the exact word count of the piece.
Two hard copies of your essay/thesis must be submitted to the Graduate Administrator, Division of Social Anthropology, Free School Lane by noon on the day of the deadline. You must also submit an electronic version via the MRes/PhD1 Moodle Course by the deadline.
You are expected to manage your time to meet the deadlines. This includes, for example, preparing a draft well in advance, to allow reasonable time for feedback from your supervisor, and final revisions. Please note that sloppy presentation (bad spelling or grammar, incomplete bibliography etc.) will be penalised by the examiners.
No extensions will be given to the deadlines, with exceptions being made only for certified medical emergencies. Essays and theses submitted after noon on the deadline days will be penalised by 5 marks for the first day, followed by 1 mark for each day of delay thereafter.
If you experience personal or other difficulties that interfere with your work, you should consult your supervisor and/or College Tutor in good time for advice and assistance. In exceptional circumstances, a case for late submission may be made through these authorities, but it must reach the graduate administrator well before the deadline. In extreme cases personal problems may require periods of intermission of studies.
Please also note that the word counts for essays and theses are strict. There are upper limits and you must not exceed them. The Division requires an electronic copy of the essay or thesis to verify the word count.
Formally, the MRes is a pass/ fail course. The standard for a pass begins at 60. Internally we note the difference between a pass (60-69) and a high pass (70-74), and a mark above 75 is awarded a distinction. If you wish to proceed to doctoral research you will be expected to achieve a high pass overall.
|75%+||Distinction||At the upper end this is work which consistently exceeds expectations and challenges received views. At the lower end it indicates work which is excellent in its range and its command of the material, and in the argument and analysis that it brings to bear.|
|70-74%||High Pass||Work showing evidence of a good, broad-based engagement with and understanding of the relevant material organised in a clearly-argued, well-illustrated and relevant fashion.|
|60-69%||Pass||At the upper end this includes work which, though competent and broadly relevant, is somewhat lacking in focus, organisation or breadth of reference. At the lower end it indicates work which, while demonstrating some knowledge of the material, is yet deficient in understanding, analysis and breadth of reference.|